The crew adjusts one of the war machines that is hanging over the fabulously detailed and realistic miniature set of mountains in the background and a forest and clearing in the foreground. |
H.G. Wells’ 1898 novel had Martians fall to earth in huge hollow meteors with the intention of colonizing the earth through the devastating power of their awesome war machines. The book does not have a plot per se as it is a series of connected war-time incidents. Despite every human effort to fight the Martians, when guns and shells and armies and navies prove impotent, when all seems irrevocably lost, the invaders all die virtually overnight because they had not thought to protect themselves from ordinary terrestrial germs. The 1953 movie has largely the same sequence of events, but they are ordered in a more coherent plot rather than the book’s string of episodes. Other differences are that the locale was changed from Britain in 1898 to Southern California in 1953, the machines’ tripod legs have been replaced with electric beams, and the novel’s nameless protagonist is changed from an inhabitant of the town of Woking, England, looking for his wife to a nuclear scientist searching for the attractive young woman who befriended him only the day before, at the outset of the catastrophe.
.
I’ve watched George Pal’s 1953 production of The War of the Worlds many times—perhaps dozens, at least half a dozen in theaters—and each time I think to myself that I am fortunate, as I’m in the presence of that rarity of rarities—a perfect movie. It is a model of economy. Not one shot is extraneous. There is no padding. The movie opens like gangbusters, and then, from first shot to last, the story builds headlong momentum until the colorful and ironic deus ex machina conclusion. The lavish Technicolor special visual effects were lovingly conceived and perfectly executed by the absolute master in the field. When I say “economy,” I mean as opposed to more recent films that seem intentionally padded, often by as much as 30 minutes or more. For example, as far as I can tell, nearly every summer tent-pole franchise blockbuster of recent years has unnecessarily elongated scenes (though, happily, there a few exceptions).
And when I say above “first shot to last,” I mean from the
first frame of film. To see what I mean, please see the separate post of this blog titled The Title Sequence of The War of the Worlds (1953)
Within a few minutes after the start of the movie, Dr.
Clayton Forrester meets Sylvia Van Buren at the edge of the steaming crater
formed by a huge meteorite. Due to the excitement caused by the meteor strike
and the fact that the town nestled against the San Gabriel Mountains is a very
small community, where everybody knows everybody, and, indeed, where a forest
ranger can and does double as a square dance caller, the two “hit it off.”
Their relationship never seems strained or artificial. It always seems
authentic in the sense that they were thrown together by a catastrophe and
shared and survived horrible events, and they simply feel comfortable with one
another, as neither has any other like-minded soul to lean on at that moment.
.
Silvia is living in a small town where she knows everybody; she is intelligent and well-educated (probably the best educated person in the town) but unworldly in some ways. He is a self-absorbed scientist whose picture had been on the cover of Time magazine. They meet and at that same moment the world crashes down around them. Me? I agree with Bill Warren, who in both editions of his Keep Watching the Skies!, says, “I like the idea [of Clayton and Sylvia], very much. It humanizes the characters and increases the feeling of desperation important to the story."
For example, in his
black-and-white Earth vs. the Flying Saucers (1956). which involved a multitude
of objects moving through the air or falling with the aid of wires, Ray
Harryhausen solved this problem by painting out each little bit of wire that
appeared as he painstakingly moved his stop-motion models one or two frames at
a time. Well in fact, Steve Rubin, in his ground-breaking Cinefantastique
making-of "The War of the Worlds" article, quotes Wallace Kelly (effects
cameraman) saying, “Naturally, you had to camouflage the wires so they don’t
pick up on camera. You simply paint them so they will blend into the
background.” Thus, this base was clearly covered during shooting. But this was
not the final optimal solution, and could only be minimally effective in a
complex color film like The War of the Worlds. The real solution lay elsewhere,
and the many top effects experts on the job put their heads together and came up
with the solution to create the illusion that the Martian war machines did
truly hover effortlessly over the terrain and streets.
As you will see later on, it's important to understand how those
Academy-Award winning effects were created, specifically how the wires
holding up the Martian war machines were removed from the finished film.
1953 was a long time ago, and information about something as obscure as
65-year-old visual effects techniques is not necessarily readily at
hand. During my research to determine what exactly the “trick” was
that obscured the wires, I contacted 50s sci-fi film expert Bill Warren,
50s
film-restorer Wade Williams, and The War
of the Worlds authority Justin Humphreys, as well as conducting an Internet
search.
So let’s hop in our time machine and travel back to 1952-53. If we conferred with the cinematographer, with the head of effects, the director, and producer George Pal, we would learn that, unlike today, 3-strip Technicolor was the color film stock of choice for major motion pictures because it produced gorgeous very saturated colors (see Gone with the Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Black Narcissus, Singin’ in the Rain, and Disney’s 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea). However, due to the simple fact that the Technicolor process required for every single inch of the finished film three separate strips of film (literally, one strip for each critical color), and that those three strips needed to be perfectly synchronized, and also due to the insanely complex several-step exposure and Technicolor dye-transfer process, the final film, while gorgeous, would be less than optimally clear, that is to say, its image resolution would be somewhat reduced. Your average film-goer would never notice this, of course.
.
But it was a God-send for the special visual effects crew of The War of the Worlds. This resolution reduction would, in effect, blur the hyper-thin piano wires just enough so that they would not be visible in the final film! Yes, miracle of miracles, special visual effects expert Gordon Jennings and his handy staff were able to magically remove the wires.
Yet, none of this is especially obvious to either those poor souls who don't have ready access to a time machine, or to those other deprived souls who've never had a chance to see The War of the Worlds 65 years ago when it was originally presented in the intended manner.
.
But it was a God-send for the special visual effects crew of The War of the Worlds. This resolution reduction would, in effect, blur the hyper-thin piano wires just enough so that they would not be visible in the final film! Yes, miracle of miracles, special visual effects expert Gordon Jennings and his handy staff were able to magically remove the wires.
Yet, none of this is especially obvious to either those poor souls who don't have ready access to a time machine, or to those other deprived souls who've never had a chance to see The War of the Worlds 65 years ago when it was originally presented in the intended manner.
.
An excellent trailer for The War of the Worlds (YouTube.com)
The obligatory
tie-in pocketbook.
|
So instead of all audiences being able to enjoy the unsullied movies throughout the decades, in the late 1960s, for reasons of both economy and ease of handling,
The War of the World prints were commonly struck (that is, copied) onto the
one-strip industrial strength Eastman Color film stock, which was much, much
easier to use than Technicolor.
However, Eastman Color had almost no blurring effect and also tended to
be brighter with higher resolution than the Technicolor prints. As a result the
carefully hidden wires of the 1950s version of the movie suddenly popped into
plain sight, so that some late 60s theater audiences laughed out loud. To make
matters worse, transferring the Eastman Color prints onto Laserdisc and DVD
only accentuated the problem due the discs’ inherent higher-resolution.
.
Here are two reviews by critics who clearly saw and remembered the original Technicolor prints of The War of the Worlds in theaters:
.
As a
result, severe criticism of the visible wires has been for 50 years, and still is, commonplace amongst the
critical community today, none of whom, as far as I'm able to find, indicate
any awareness that the wires were not visible during the original showings in
the 50s. Neither do any indicate any understanding of the change in technology
that has resulted in the wires becoming increasingly visible. And they seem
hopelessly ignorant that due to progressive transferals of the film onto newer
and newer media with no attempt whatsoever to minimize or solve this problem,
the wires are clear as crystal on recent DVDs. To make 100% clear my assertions about the critical community being oblivious to the pristine nature of the original film, and how the careless transfers onto a different stock basically wrecked the film—with no professional paying any apparent attention!—I copy below some real quotes from real professional reviewers (and, frankly, it is very hard to align the sheer volume and degree of scorn represented here with any sort of reality). Every one of these respected critics ought to have known from the get-go, without having to be told, that the
wires were never visible in the original presentations of this crown-jewel
film. Instead, too many have persistently and tediously complained about a nonexistent deficiency:
• Leonard Maltin’s Family Film Guide: “Kids are likely to
smirk at some of the special effects (as when the wires holding up the war
machines are visible).”
• John Brosnan’s Future Tense: “Unfortunately these wires
are often visible on the screen, particularly during the sequence when the war
machines first emerge from their crater and engage the army in battle.”
• Phil Hardy’s The Overlook Film Encyclopedia: Science
Fiction: “Not all Jennings’ spectacular special effects work well—on their
first appearance the Martian war machines have an obvious network of wires
surrounding them.”
• John Clute’s and Peter Nicholls’ The Encyclopedia of
Science Fiction: “The wires holding up the machines are too often visible.”
• Gary Gerani’s Top 100 Sci-Fi Movies: “While those cables
holding up the machines are painfully visible, viewers tend to cut pre-digital
fx a good deal of slack.”
• C.J Henderson’s The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
Movies: From 1897 to the Present : “Wells’ unique walking tripods are replaced
by ordinary spaceship-like designs that move on beams of light. This wouldn’t
be so bad if the wires holding them up weren’t visible in many scenes.” (By the
way, Mr. Henderson, there is nothing “ordinary” about the manta ray/cobra
design of the war machines; these are some of the most unusual yet elegant and
beautifully conceived alien machines ever filmed.)
• John Clute’s The Science Fiction Encyclopedia: “The first
appearance of the war machines, after an impressive build-up of suspense, is
spoilt by the obvious maze of wires supporting each one.”
• Time, Inc.’s Special magazine publication, LIFE—Science
Fiction: 100 Years of Great Movies, Vol. 16, No. 9, June 24, 2016: “The movie
cost $2 million, and its $1.4 million worth of special effects remains, despite
visible wires, impressive even in an age of CGI.”
• Barry Forshaw’s The War of the Worlds (BFI): “[I]t has to
do be said that [the use of wires] is one of the most dated elements of the
special-effects, as they are all too clearly visible in many sequences of the
film.... In British showings of the film (when it was re-released in a curious
late-1960s US/UK double bill with Hitchcock’s Psycho [1960]), the more
sophisticated audiences of the day chuckled at these antediluvian
special-effects.” Note that these British audiences just mentioned happened to
catch the movie just at the time when the wires began to be made visible when the
first Eastman Color prints of the film were struck in the 1960s.
British film authority John Baxter in his truly ground-breaking and universally acclaimed 1970 volume, Science Fiction in the Cinema, does in fact take many predicable potshots at elements of 1953’s The War of the Worlds, yet he also says, “Colorful, cleverly worked out, [The War of the Worlds] ... marked the beginning of a durable collaboration between Pal and director Haskin....Together they have made a series of sf films which for the literal depiction of the fantastic, are hard to fault. No stylist, Haskin brings to his films a stolid realism which is ideally suited to his stories of space exploration and alien worlds. In his hands, the already impeccable special-effects seem even more real.”
.
In addition, John Stanley said in his Creature Features: The
Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Movie Guide, “George Pal’s commendable
version of H.G. Wells novel of a Martian invasion— imaginatively depicted in
the Oscar winning effects of Gordon Jennings ... unfolds with such compelling
swiftness and breathless action that the invasion takes on epic proportions ...
the opening prologue is beautifully rendered.... One of the few sci-fi classics
of the cinema.
HOWEVER, all that said and done, by 2018 somebody in power FINALLY, miraculously—FINALLY, PRAISE GOD!—restored the film to original 1953 quality!—in UHR 4K even! Be still my heart! Practically speaking, then, this means, the five paragraphs above ARE pretty much MOOT. It only took 50 YEARS, but somebody FINALLY noticed that this priceless crown jewel of a film had severe problems through no fault of its own, and decided to do something about it!
HOWEVER, all that said and done, by 2018 somebody in power FINALLY, miraculously—FINALLY, PRAISE GOD!—restored the film to original 1953 quality!—in UHR 4K even! Be still my heart! Practically speaking, then, this means, the five paragraphs above ARE pretty much MOOT. It only took 50 YEARS, but somebody FINALLY noticed that this priceless crown jewel of a film had severe problems through no fault of its own, and decided to do something about it!
The War of the Worlds (1953)
USA. Paramount Pictures. Color by Technicolor. Three-channel stereo. 1.37:1/1.85:1. 85m.
CREW: Director Byron Haskin. Producer George Pal. Script
Barré Lyndon. Based on the Novel By H.G. Wells. Score Leith Stevens. Assistant
Director Michael D. Moore. Director of Photography George Barnes. Technicolor
Color Consultant Monroe W. Burbank. Art Directors Albert Nozaki, Hal Pereira.
Associate Producer Frank Freeman, Jr. Astronomical Art Chesley Bonestell. Sound
Effects Gene Garvin, Harry Lindgren. Special Photographic Effects Gordon
Jennings, Wallace Kelley, Paul Lerpae, Ivyl Burks, Jan Domela, Irmin Roberts.
Costumes Edith Head. Editor Everett Douglas. Sets Decorators Sam Comer, Emile
Kuri.
CAST: Narrators Paul Frees, Sir Cedric Hardwicke. Clayton
Forrester Gene Barry. Sylvia Van Buren Ann Robinson. General Mann Les Tremayne.
Dr. Pryor Robert Cornthwaite. Dr. Bilderbeck Sandro Giglio. Reverand Collins
Lewis Martin.
Great article! But 1953 to 2018 is not 70 years but 65 years ago.
ReplyDelete