Peter Hyams should be ashamed!!! He's a smart guy. Without a doubt he knew there would repercussions once this movie was released. Why did he make it? How COULD he make it? Many people will go to their graves insisting that Apollo was a hoax. Hyams' movie only made that kind of thinking legitimate. I'm not interested in any of his other movies. CAPRICORN ONE was disgraceful and seriously affected people in a negative way. I repeat, he should have known that would happen, and he should have passed on the film. All these years later, the movement he help build is still making headlines (granted, this is from a year ago, but can anybody say it's likely anything changed?)
:
.
Millions Still Believe the 1969 Moon Landing Was a Hoax
By Ken Schwartz
July 20, 2019 07:07 AM
Despite the huge amount of evidence, the dust and rock
samples, the television footage, and the hundreds of thousands of people who
made it happen, polls show as many as 6% of Americans believe the Apollo 11
astronauts never landed on the moon.
Conspiracy theorists continue to insist the entire mission
50 years ago was an elaborate hoax, produced at the Area 51 Air Force testing
range in Nevada or on a Hollywood movie soundstage by legendary director
Stanley Kubrick.
The rumors first got traction just a year after the first
moon landing, when the Vietnam War had led millions of Americans to question
their government.
A July1970 poll found 30% of Americans declaring Apollo 11
to be a fake. That number remained relatively high throughout the '70s, when
several books were published and a 1978 film about a phony mission to Mars,
Capricorn One, convinced many that a moon landing was also a scripted piece of
high-technology bunk.
NASA file image shows Neil Armstrong on the moon next to the
Lunar Module Eagle
Buzz Aldrin, 2nd Man on Moon, Recalls 'Magnificent
Desolation'
Art Harmon, a former legislative director for the U.S. House
or Representatives, currently leads the Coalition to Save Manned Space
Exploration.
He has two words for conspiracy theorists who say men never
went to the moon – "absolute nuts."
"They’re just troublemakers. There's always people who
will say 'this never happened' or 'that never happened.' They’re just trying to
divide people. We went," he said.
But those who insist the U.S. did not put astronauts on the
moon have claimed their own "evidence" to a faked landing.
|
The conceit of Peter Hyams’ Capricorn One is that in the
near
future, NASA fakes a manned Mars landing by using
Hollywood’s tricks of the trade, sets and special effects.
|
They question why the flag astronaut Neil Armstrong planted
on the moon could not possibly be rippling, because there is no air on the
moon. In reality, the astronauts bent the metal frame holding the flag, causing
the ripples.
** FILE ** In this July 20, 1969 file photo, Apollo 11
astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin E. "Buzz" Aldrin, the first men
to land on the moon, plant the U.S. flag on the lunar surface. (NASA) Apollo
11's Astronauts Snapped Photos for Science.
The conspiracy minded claim photos the astronauts took on
the moon do not show any stars in the background. In reality, the cameras were
unable to capture the faint light emitted by stars,
If the moon landing was real, they ask, why didn't the
lander scatter dust when it touched down? In reality, the lander was traveling
horizontally much of the time and the thrusters that controlled its landing
were not pointed down. Radiation from the sun also made the dust highly charged
and it clung to the moon’s surface.
Every claim that no one went to the moon can be easily
explained by science, physics or evidence brought back to Earth, Harmon said.
He adds the conspiracy theories are "an insult to those 400,000 Americans
who worked to get us to the moon and back."
Those hundreds of thousands of people, including scientists,
engineers and factory workers, were scattered around the world.
One astronaut who actually walked on the moon in 1969 has no
tolerance for those who call it a massive hoax.
When one conspiracy theorist challenged Buzz Aldrin and
called him a liar, Aldrin punched him in the face.
* * *
I had to think long and
hard whether to include this movie in my book Mars in the Movies: A History. While it is ostensibly about the USA’s
first flight to Mars, it is actually a flick about a government conspiracy run
by the higher ups at NASA, a conspiracy that adds some Government-sanctioned
murder into the mix for a little spice. Frankly I think such a notion is
reprehensible. But in the end, I decided that there would be quite a few
readers who would expect to find this movie in this sort of book, so I relented.
Summary. Before take off,
it’s discovered that the first manned mission to Mars is in jeopardy because
the landing capsule is flawed and the astronauts would not survive. This is not
acceptable because public interest and government funding for NASA must not be
lost, or else the U.S. space program would go belly up. A quick plan is
designed and implemented, which would remove the astronauts from the flight
just before the rocket takes off, hide them away for the allotted number of
months, let them do video broadcasts from a simulated capsule and from a phony
movie-set-style Mars surface tucked into a military warehouse, as necessary for
verisimilitude.
Once the return capsule returns, the astronauts would
secretly be returned to their craft, and the world can have its tickertape
parades. But there is one problem: the return capsule burns up on reentry.
Well, you just can’t have three astronauts running around when they’re supposed to be dead. So NASA does everything it can to kill and dispose of the astronauts
so they can be properly mourned by the world. A news reporter accidentally
becomes aware of the plot, doggedly tracks down all the people and places
involved in the scheme, saves one of the three astronauts, and breaks the
story.
Peter Hyams is a director who
frequently does his own cinematography. This is not at all usual and puts him
squarely in the camp founded by the great William Cameron Menzies, who fought
for industry-wide acceptance of the Production Designer and Director of
Cinematography being recognized as essential to filmmaking as the Director. Capricorn One was his fourth Hollywood feature
film; it was followed by, among many more in his 40-year career, Hanover Street (1979) with Harrison Ford,
Outland (1981) with Sean Connery, The Star Chamber (1983) with Michael
Douglas, 2o10 (1984) with Roy
Scheider, The Presidio (1988) with Sean
Connery, The Relic (1997) based on
the best-selling novel by Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, and End
of Days (1999) with Arnold Schwarzenegger, and at least
three pictures with Jean-Claude Van Damme.
|
A few of Peter Hyams' films. |
Hyams’ body of work
comprises mainly genre films of the science-fiction type, but also includes a
number of straight dramas. Capricorn One
was probably his first attempt at a real A-list movie, and his output
thereafter mostly fell into this same league. He hit the jackpot when he headed
up the film version of Arthur C. Clarke’s best-selling novel 2010, the first sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) Clarke’s
novelization of one of the all-time great science fiction films directed by
Stanley Kubrick and co-written by Clarke and Kubrick.
Frankly I don't understand how Clarke could have, in conscience, agreed to allow Hyams to make 2010. One of Clarke's dearest friends was Wernher von Braun, who headed the Apollo Project. Clarke, too, had lived almost all his life promoting spaceflight. How could he sell the rights to 2010 to a man who probably did more to undermine the U.S space program than Richard Nixon—the man who had the power to cancel and mothball our space program . . . and did!
Among the highlights of
2010's production design was the effort made to replicate various sets and
props and the spaceship from the 1968 film. Since these no longer existed,
they all needed to be remade using photographs from the first film.
|
Copyright 1984 |
However, in my view, Hyams’
choosing Roy Scheider to play the William Sylvester role (from 2001: A Space Odyssey) could not have
been more ill-advised. In fact, the first sentence of Clarke’s first ever
e-mail (Sept. 16, 1983) to Hyams, as recorded in The Odyssey File by Arthur C. Clarke and Peter Hyams, says,
“William Sylvester (Dr. Floyd in ‘2001’) phoned recently from L.A. and talked
at some length—but I’m not clear if he was after his old role or not (he said
he was semi-retired). You might contact him.” One of the secrets of all good
story telling is suspension of disbelief, yet Scheider’s presence never let me
immerse myself in 2010, which took
all the fun out of it for me. Yes, I am fully aware of the commercial and financial considerations that dictated using a star in the leading role, and Scheider was certainly a big star in those days. But my concern still stands; I could not and have not been able to enjoy the movie despite many attempts. It seems to me that when a character from an
earlier movie makes an appearance in a sequel using a different
actor, some attempt must be made to correlate the two. To blatantly choose an actor whose presence on screen is the polar opposite of the original actor is a problem in my view. (The same unnecessary
disconnect happened when Leonard Nimoy chose Robin Curtis to replace Kirstie
Alley’s Saavik in Star Trek III: The
Search for Spock; there simply had to be a more relatable choice.) But of course this could simply be chalked up as my foible.
From Clarke’s
point-of-view, Hollywood’s being interested in 2010 must have been a highlight.
Clarke was always one to be seduced by the glare of Hollywood. Many of his
stories and novels were optioned over time, but none of them panned out except,
of course, 2001, which just happened
to be one of the most important movies ever made. Still, by ten years later, he
had no better luck with movies than before 2001,
so he probably leaped at the chance of having 2010 filmed. He must have enjoyed his fleeting cameo sitting on a park bench. Of course, in the days of pan-and-scan, thankfully pretty much extinct these days, he would have been chopped from the left side of the screen!
USA/UK. Sir Lew Grade,
Associated General Films, Lazarus/Hyams Productions, Capricorn One Associates,
Incorporated Television Company (ITC). C. 2.35:1. 123m
CREW: Director Peter Hyams. Script
Peter Hyams. Producer Paul N. Lazarus
III. Score Jerry Goldsmith. Director of Photography Bill Butler. Production Designer Albert Brenner. Editor James Mitchell. Casting Mike Fenton, Jane Feinberg. Special Visual Effects Van Der Veer
Photo Effects.
CAST: Robert Caulfield Elliott Gould. Charles
Brubaker James Brolin. Kay Brubaker
Brenda Vaccaro. Peter Willis Sam
Waterston. John Walker O.J. Simpson. Dr. James Kelloway Hal Holbrook. Judy Drinkwater Karen Black. Albain Telly Savalas.
Formal Notice: All images, quotations, and video/audio clips used in this blog and
in its individual posts are used either with permissions from the copyright
holders or through exercise of the doctrine of Fair Use as described in U.S.
copyright law, or are in the public domain. If any true copyright holder
(whether person[s] or organization) wishes an image or quotation or clip to be
removed from this blog and/or its individual posts, please send a note with a
clear request and explanation to eely84232@mypacks.net and your request will be
gladly complied with as quickly as practical.